From a Package to another GI Joe 2 - The Revenge
What a laugh the first GI Joe. They turn always spectacular voices sull'inettitudine congenital Stephen Sommers, and it was a lot of fun to follow the events of the first film production, at least until I had to even see it. Why Sommers, if by chance you missed it, holds the enviable zero zero title of director of action fracassone that even despise us. The inability of disease in man has a deadly power. In rece foresaw a sequel with the original zero zero actors have all changed and looks a bit '? That's exactly what happened. zero zero But I was wrong when I foresaw also that the sequel would be released directly on DVD, because in fact I never thought that we would have believed so much to change for the better. Via Marlon Wayans, in The Rock. Via Dennis Quaid, Bruce Willis inside. They made it look really easy too, and thank goodness they stopped otherwise at this rate began to claim Tony Jaa in place of Ray Park. For the director instead they made a small bet assuming John M. Chu, whose curriculum currently includes only dance film and / or Justin Bieber. And while some of you understandably zero zero turn up your nose, but I thought that infuses the dance films are simply martial arts movies where you do not beat around. You have more to do with athletes and actors, you have to have a taste of the choreography, and you have to learn to interpret the technical movements / acrobatic work on aesthetics and clarity of image and movement: everything for an action zero zero is like cheese on Macaroni, as well as the exact opposite of the evil tendencies of recent abuse of Parkinson cam. With a solid precedent zero zero which that Kevin Tancharoen who went from Fame and Glee 3D Mortal Kombat Legacy was ready to swear that the future of the action was in the dance, and I was so intrigued by this thing that I had promised to watch Step Up 2:03 to get to this review with a clear perspective unexpectedly, then luckily I come to his senses and I let it go. Optimism, however, I was left, and it did not even last when they postponed the movie seven months (SEVEN) officially to inflate it in 3D and to increase the playing time of Channing Tatum, who in the meantime had guessed surprise three films in a row and had become the actor of the moment. Not to mention the fact that the Italian translators for once they made a good choice and decided to translate the subtitle "Retaliation" with the classic of classics, "Revenge." Happiness.
The first issue I want to talk, however, is just the 3D. I was more than ready to the most classic of post-conversion unnecessary zero zero and semi-invisible, and yet we are faced with a case even annoying, when in spite of mounting and framing clearly does not allow it was in fact wanted to scale the depth at all costs, even against all sense. Result: at best the effects are ugly and confusing, at worst captain clearly designed for 2D shots in which the camera moves behind a character and a total lunatic thought that the best way to add depth to be a rockin ' blurred huge back straight zero zero on the nose. Complimentoni. Let me just state flatly: GI Joe 2 in 3D is an experience WORST. Do your best to dodge it. Moving on to the film itself, the first thing that surprised me by John M. Chu - but maybe would not have done if I had found the courage to really watch the movie Step Up - it's the way he directs his actors, putting them at ease and leaving them free to improvise and do some 'of zero zero hubbub. Obviously this does not apply to self-propelled puppet DJ Cotrona (Flint) and Adrianne Palicki (Lady Jaye) (#wouldbang violently the same), but shows an agreement between spectacular Channing zero zero Tatum (Duke) and The Rock (Roadblock), and pulls out fun performance by Bruce Willis, Ray Stevenson (Firefly) and especially Walton "beer" Goggins. But seriously, Tatone and Rock should do a whole movie together, like two supercolli to the rescue. The spirit of the film gains: there is no more desire to show supergadget meaningless and especially without knowing how to manage (pay) the special effects needed to support them, but the calm relaxed adventure to build simple, at child height (you knew), that fun without overdoing it. Choreography Chu keeps his promise to balance the action with wide angles and shots clear, but it is still too fast for 3D and limited mostly to clean homework rarely leaving his mouth open.
In a plot that keeps you programmed
What a laugh the first GI Joe. They turn always spectacular voices sull'inettitudine congenital Stephen Sommers, and it was a lot of fun to follow the events of the first film production, at least until I had to even see it. Why Sommers, if by chance you missed it, holds the enviable zero zero title of director of action fracassone that even despise us. The inability of disease in man has a deadly power. In rece foresaw a sequel with the original zero zero actors have all changed and looks a bit '? That's exactly what happened. zero zero But I was wrong when I foresaw also that the sequel would be released directly on DVD, because in fact I never thought that we would have believed so much to change for the better. Via Marlon Wayans, in The Rock. Via Dennis Quaid, Bruce Willis inside. They made it look really easy too, and thank goodness they stopped otherwise at this rate began to claim Tony Jaa in place of Ray Park. For the director instead they made a small bet assuming John M. Chu, whose curriculum currently includes only dance film and / or Justin Bieber. And while some of you understandably zero zero turn up your nose, but I thought that infuses the dance films are simply martial arts movies where you do not beat around. You have more to do with athletes and actors, you have to have a taste of the choreography, and you have to learn to interpret the technical movements / acrobatic work on aesthetics and clarity of image and movement: everything for an action zero zero is like cheese on Macaroni, as well as the exact opposite of the evil tendencies of recent abuse of Parkinson cam. With a solid precedent zero zero which that Kevin Tancharoen who went from Fame and Glee 3D Mortal Kombat Legacy was ready to swear that the future of the action was in the dance, and I was so intrigued by this thing that I had promised to watch Step Up 2:03 to get to this review with a clear perspective unexpectedly, then luckily I come to his senses and I let it go. Optimism, however, I was left, and it did not even last when they postponed the movie seven months (SEVEN) officially to inflate it in 3D and to increase the playing time of Channing Tatum, who in the meantime had guessed surprise three films in a row and had become the actor of the moment. Not to mention the fact that the Italian translators for once they made a good choice and decided to translate the subtitle "Retaliation" with the classic of classics, "Revenge." Happiness.
The first issue I want to talk, however, is just the 3D. I was more than ready to the most classic of post-conversion unnecessary zero zero and semi-invisible, and yet we are faced with a case even annoying, when in spite of mounting and framing clearly does not allow it was in fact wanted to scale the depth at all costs, even against all sense. Result: at best the effects are ugly and confusing, at worst captain clearly designed for 2D shots in which the camera moves behind a character and a total lunatic thought that the best way to add depth to be a rockin ' blurred huge back straight zero zero on the nose. Complimentoni. Let me just state flatly: GI Joe 2 in 3D is an experience WORST. Do your best to dodge it. Moving on to the film itself, the first thing that surprised me by John M. Chu - but maybe would not have done if I had found the courage to really watch the movie Step Up - it's the way he directs his actors, putting them at ease and leaving them free to improvise and do some 'of zero zero hubbub. Obviously this does not apply to self-propelled puppet DJ Cotrona (Flint) and Adrianne Palicki (Lady Jaye) (#wouldbang violently the same), but shows an agreement between spectacular Channing zero zero Tatum (Duke) and The Rock (Roadblock), and pulls out fun performance by Bruce Willis, Ray Stevenson (Firefly) and especially Walton "beer" Goggins. But seriously, Tatone and Rock should do a whole movie together, like two supercolli to the rescue. The spirit of the film gains: there is no more desire to show supergadget meaningless and especially without knowing how to manage (pay) the special effects needed to support them, but the calm relaxed adventure to build simple, at child height (you knew), that fun without overdoing it. Choreography Chu keeps his promise to balance the action with wide angles and shots clear, but it is still too fast for 3D and limited mostly to clean homework rarely leaving his mouth open.
In a plot that keeps you programmed
No comments:
Post a Comment